
March 7, 2022
We listened in on a “virtual” Technical Conference at the Ontario Energy Board this morning, and we are glad we did.
The consultant acting for Energy Probe appeared to ask questions about application 2022-0293, in which the City of Ottawa objects to a natural gas pipeline replacement on St Laurent because, according to the Energy Evolution document which they offer as evidence, Ottawa will be using 90-percent less natural gas.
Instead, the plan proposes, the City will be using electricity from various sources including, a model for 710 wind turbines.
We have been clear: we think Energy Evolution is a deeply flawed document that does NOT do what people want it to—fight climate change.
The proposal of hundreds of wind turbines is choosing an intermittent, unreliable energy source that will cause electricity bills to rise, will harm the environment and people, and will NOT help the environment.
That’s clear.
So the Energy Probe consultant chose to use a posting on our website that makes reference to a document by the ICSC, critical of the Energy Evolution plan.
Instead of answering questions about our concerns about wind turbines and the Energy Evolution plan, counsel for one witness, the School Energy Coalition , responded with the claim that Ottawa Wind Concerns is a “climate change denier organization.”
That is demonstrably untrue.
It’s also slander.
We have filed a letter of complaint with the Ontario Energy Board demanding that the comments be struck from the record.
Our position is that we want the best for the environment.
We want energy sources that work, not harm.
This is an egregious tactic employed to silence communities and citizens. It may be worth noting that the lawyer in question, Mr Jay Shepherd, is a former member of the Board of Directors for the Canadian Wind Energy Association (CanWEA).
ottawawindconcerns@gmail.com
Pingback: Response to questions on wind turbines: slander | ajmarciniak